It Could Be
Worse
In 2005,
Kaiser Research released averages for the national
teen pregnancy rate.
My little town of
Canton
received kudos for having the highest in the nation.
It was a big ‘to-do’, you know.
Reporters plagued our high schools and stalked
our teachers, all wanting to know one thing:
How did this happen here?
At the time,
the national average was around eight percent, while
Timken
High School
in
Canton
was at about thirteen percent.
Now, two years later, I was curious to see
where we stand. So,
I called up my friends at the community Planned
Parenthood and picked their brains.
It started with a simple call to Vivian Tindell,
community educator; who kindly directed me to Joanne
Green, communications manager.
The following interview, via email, is the
product of that brain picking.
1)
As
of 20005,
Timken
High School
was determined to have the highest teen pregnancy rate
in the nation. Now,
two years later, do you find that this rate is
increasing, decreasing, or staying the same?
If increasing or decreasing, would you happen
to the current statistics?
In 2005, the high school did not have the
highest teen pregnancy rate in the country.
It was a high number, but I’m not so sure
that highest in the nation is accurate.
Two articles in the Canton Repository called
“mustard seeds” were the original articles that
got this whole thing started.
We do not, yet, have the current statistics for
local teen pregnancies.
Even then, these are only the cases reported to
the Health Department.
2)
Since
the 2005 report, have programs been implemented to
address the issue and, if so, what are they?
How are
they different from what was being done before?
Planned Parenthood had limited, if any,
involvement in the schools at the time the story
broke. We
had not been invited into the city high schools to
provide education in the city schools; it was only
through the GRADS Program, which was for pregnant and
parenting teens. When
the program was eliminated, so was Planned
Parenthood’s educational role at Timken.
Somewhere along the line-in or around the year
2000-other local agencies started providing
abstinence-only programs to the city schools.
That’s how it’s been for quite some time.
I think, in recent years, there was a push
toward abstinence-only.
Schools received a lot of funding for these
programs (where there is no funding source for
comprehensive sex education) and abstinence-only
probably seemed more attractive from a parental
standpoint. Again,
no one wants to think of their kids having sex.
It wasn’t until this teen pregnancy crisis
made national headlines that things began to change.
Now, we’re being invited to the table and
into conversations about this very important issue.
Small steps are better than no steps at all.
There is so much that we are doing to try to
reduce teen pregnancy in our community.
I could go on and on.
Most important to know is that Planned
Parenthood believes in planning for children when
individuals and families are physically, emotionally,
and financially ready for all the rewards and
responsibilities that come with the territory.
When it comes to teens, we believe abstinence
is an important part of a comprehensive sexuality
education curriculum.
Abstinence is a birth control method that can
fail just like the others if it’s not used correctly
and consistently every time.
It’s an important part of our curricula
dealing with healthy relationships, decision-making,
and communication.
But, by itself, it does a great disservice to
our youth. Everyone
deserves medically accurate information about biology,
their bodies, reproduction, etc. presented in an
age-appropriate manner with an emphasis on prevention
and responsibility.
3)
What
do you think the parent response is to the pregnancy
issue and how to decrease
the number of pregnant teens?
I don’t know what the parents’ response
should be or is regarding this issue.
I imagine parents aren’t very happy to hear
about it and don’t want to think about their kids
having sex anymore than their kids want to think about
them having sex. But if you're really asking about parental responsibility, I can answer
that. Planned Parenthood believes that parents are and
should be the sexuality primary educator of their
children. Study after study has shown that kids do
listen to their parents and do look to their
parents' example and do consider their parents to be
their primary influence - even if they won't
necessarily admit this to their parents. Kids
want guidance without condescension. Planned
Parenthood has a plethora of resources for parents
that want to establish healthy communication with
their kids about these sorts of topics. ‘Let's
Talk’ Kits are available at different age levels to
give parents age-appropriate tools for discussing
everything from basic anatomy and appropriate vs.
inappropriate touching for younger kids to STDs
and teen pregnancy for older kids. In addition, we
have comprehensive resource lending libraries, a
growing volume of web-based resources, and educators
that will work with parents one-on-one or in groups to
help parents take control - and feel like they know
what they are talking about. There's more, but you get
the idea.
I'm not sure parents really know how to decrease
teen pregnancy. Personally, I think most parents
believe their kids are not the ones having sex - it's
someone else's kids, so they don't think they have
to worry about it. I also think parents think their
kids already know more than them about the topic and I
think kids think they know more than their parents
about the topic. I also think most people would rather
avoid uncomfortable subjects - not just those related
to sex - so I think there is a lot of fear and
embarrassment and anxiety involved. I think there are
a lot of other reasons parents don't talk to their
kids about sex. This is unfortunate because it's such
an important subject - one that can have real consequences
that can seriously impact their kids' futures.
4)
Why
do you believe this is such an issue in
Canton
? I don't think this is unique to
Canton
, but without more current statistics, I have nothing
concrete on which to base this assumption. I think the
story jumped out at the time and was good for the
ratings, although it was pretty startling - we didn't
know about it ahead of time, but we got calls for months. One
of my criticisms early on was that the original story
didn't provide an adequate comparison to Timken's teen
pregnancy rate and other similar schools. It also
didn't go far enough in comparing McKinley to Timken.
I think this was a huge disservice and just plain bad
journalism. How did this community compare to similar
communities? How did Timken compare to other downtown
schools in cities of similar size with similar
socioeconomic, racial and education make-ups, etc.?
Why the discrepancy between Timken and McKinley? Are
McKinley's numbers underreported? Do the schools
attract different types of students? Are programs at
these schools focused in such a way that more pregnant
or parenting teens would choose (or be chosen for) Timken
over McKinley? I don't have answers.
I think teen pregnancy is a problem generally
because you are talking about teenagers and sex. I
think a lot of its biology and I think it's cultural.
5)
What
role does Planned Parenthood take in the schools
regarding education on sex?
Planned
Parenthood always makes an effort to work with the
schools in all
Stark
County
communities. We go where we are invited and we try to
make inroads where we can. Where we can't go into a
school, we will work with decision-makers to provide
information and materials for a well-balanced
curriculum. We also provide workshops and training
opportunities for health teachers, GRADS teachers,
counselors, parents, community groups, and health
professionals - pretty much anyone interested in these
issues. We even advertise in student newspapers.
Sometimes, if we can't get into a school for
educational programming, we might be able to get an ad
in the school paper. Then students can at least find
us online, have a phone number to call, and know we're
in their neighborhood if they need us for any reason.
The role we take really depends on the school,
the administration, and other involved parties. If
asked, we will even speak to school boards, PTAs,
and whoever else has concerns about our programs to
maintain transparency and gain consensus. Our
intention is to reach out in a positive way to help
schools address this important issue so that we
can better prevent unplanned teen
pregnancies.
Thank you to Joanne Green and Vivian Tindell of Stark
County Planned Parenthood for their insight and
assistance with this piece.